|
Post by kehgonthediva on Mar 11, 2009 23:56:59 GMT -5
Ten years from now, when Baby Killer has reached three hundred pounds in prison eating Twinkies and Now and Laters, and people barely remember who she is and care even less, that will be the title of her new book.
Some other working titles:
"If I Killed My Daughter, This Is How I would Do It" (co written with OJ) "My Brother The Uncle AND the Baby Daddy" "Parenting Tips Or How To Get Your Baby To Sleep FAST" "Parenting For Baby Killer Dummies" "Here's Your Fuckin' Gas Cans: The Life And Times Of Casey 'Baby Killer' Anthony" (The abridged version)
BTW, did anyone catch her telling Lee how she hired Baez? She said she got the number from other inmates in booking. Now I come from a family of lawyers. If you can't show you can afford the lawyer (and most ask for a retainer) you're getting a PD. Is it different in Florida? If it's not, how did she afford Baez and did he agree to take the case Pro Bono? This raises some questions for me cause she had NO verified income when she was arrested.
No wonder the prosecutors are asking Baez questions.
|
|
|
Post by crimebuff55 on Mar 12, 2009 22:07:57 GMT -5
Ten years from now, when Baby Killer has reached three hundred pounds in prison eating Twinkies and Now and Laters, and people barely remember who she is and care even less, that will be the title of her new book. Some other working titles: "If I Killed My Daughter, This Is How I would Do It" (co written with OJ) "My Brother The Uncle AND the Baby Daddy" "Parenting Tips Or How To Get Your Baby To Sleep FAST" "Parenting For Baby Killer Dummies" "Here's Your Fuckin' Gas Cans: The Life And Times Of Casey 'Baby Killer' Anthony" (The abridged version) BTW, did anyone catch her telling Lee how she hired Baez? She said she got the number from other inmates in booking. Now I come from a family of lawyers. If you can't show you can afford the lawyer (and most ask for a retainer) you're getting a PD. Is it different in Florida? If it's not, how did she afford Baez and did he agree to take the case Pro Bono? This raises some questions for me cause she had NO verified income when she was arrested. No wonder the prosecutors are asking Baez questions. ---------- Um, everyone including myself suspects incest. So anything else weird about this family shouldn't be a surprise, either. If TotMom had zero bucks to pay for an attorney that SHE hired, what might the bed hopper offer a male attorney for his services? Perhaps a barter agreement? You know. Er, "services" in exchange for "services." Its not that unlikely !
|
|
|
Post by janea64 on Mar 13, 2009 9:22:08 GMT -5
Cindy told the OCSO that Casey told her that she had $1,500 bucks in the bank to pay Baez. Well we know that is not true and Lord knows what she told Baez. He must surely know by now that that is not true and would not even come close to being enough to pay him. If he was doing it Pro Bono, than why doesn't he just say he is doing it Pro Bono. But instead, he refers to his "dream team" as hired lawyers and experts. He says this week that he has done nothing illegal or unethical and has conferred with an ethics lawyer. He is up to something, and that is why the prosecutor's office wants to know how he is being compensated.
Anyone catch the pre-trial yesterday?
Highlights: George blew his nose into a handkerchief and showed it to Cindy. They both examined it for a minute. Casey looked like she was going to vomit a couple of times. Jose called the guy who collected evidence from the car to the stand (strange for pre-trial, are we surprised?) who is a Latino and Baez in a show of solidarity made sure he had the right ethnic pronunciation to his name. Baez's blonde bombshell wannabe made a fool of herself. Baez asked that since the cameras were in the front of the court, that they not be allowed to zoom in on them or the table to see their notes that Casey is taking and it is a n invasion of their privacy when they zoom in for tight head shots... Like he can really tell that they are zoomed in by looking at their lenses.
I think this trial will be very interesting, but quite boring most of the time if yesterday was any indication. I think I will just watch the highlights on the news... Baez is not a very eloquent speaker. Him and blondie kept saying the same thing over and over the exact same way when asked by Strickland to clarify. And instead of asking to investigator on the stand "your report indicates blah, blah, blah, is that true?" "Tell me what your report says" when the guy does not have a copy of the report and then waiting for him to find it in the report when he is given a copy. And then badgering him because his handwritten notes had been destroyed.
|
|
|
Post by kehgonthediva on Mar 13, 2009 17:00:21 GMT -5
The prosecution may offer a plea deal because it saves the state the expense of a lengthy trial. That's pretty common. Of course if they offer a plea deal Baez will whine "It's because they have no substantial evidence" but that's not necessarily true.
Also, the prosecution is asking about who is paying what in Camp Crazy/Hotel Baez because they want to make sure Casey can't come back on appeal and say that Baez did not represent her well because he seduced her. Most of the general public knows Casey is a skank, but if Baez and Baby Killer are getting kissy-faced, he's going to be up on some ethical charges. He can bop her all he wants if he's not representing her, but as her lawyer he has got to watch himself. No matter how much of a ho she is, if they are having any sort of relationship outside lawyer/client, she can come back and ask for a re-trial with the claim Baez was being unethical and had seduced her when she was his client.
|
|
|
Post by crimebuff55 on Mar 13, 2009 22:53:36 GMT -5
The prosecution may offer a plea deal because it saves the state the expense of a lengthy trial. That's pretty common. Of course if they offer a plea deal Baez will whine "It's because they have no substantial evidence" but that's not necessarily true. Also, the prosecution is asking about who is paying what in Camp Crazy/Hotel Baez because they want to make sure Casey can't come back on appeal and say that Baez did not represent her well because he seduced her. Most of the general public knows Casey is a skank, but if Baez and Baby Killer are getting kissy-faced, he's going to be up on some ethical charges. He can bop her all he wants if he's not representing her, but as her lawyer he has got to watch himself. No matter how much of a ho she is, if they are having any sort of relationship outside lawyer/client, she can come back and ask for a re-trial with the claim Baez was being unethical and had seduced her when she was his client. "..... Biaz did not represent her well because HE seduced HER " ?? Uh, I don't think that would be as likely as SHE seduced him..... or at least bartered a trade in "services" since she has zero money of her own. SHE had demonstrated by all her photographs exactly what she is. A tatooed, boozing, slut baby killer. Even if she gets off, only a fool idiot would want to date her again. She has ruined the lives of everyone around her. She got a boyfriend fired from his cop job, coyly accused another boyfriend of possibly putting the body into her car, cussed at her parents, and as many suspect.... probably engaged in incest with her own brother during a "party" of two.
|
|
|
Post by kehgonthediva on Mar 13, 2009 23:28:24 GMT -5
I'm not trying to be mean here, crimebuff, but you didn't read my post well enough if you responded like you did to it. Read it again; you'll see we all know Baby Killer is a Ho, but on an ethics committee that means little. She could have seduced Baez, but the burden is on him to keep ethical. Tho he's such an ambulance chaser, he probably has a whole new spin on attorney/client "privilege".
What I said the prosecution wants to make sure they have an airtight case, and not Casey winning on an appeal for a retrial because Baez did not represent her well because he was spending too much time in her pants. You know court trials, all types of things can come up, i.e. no miranda, police brutality, etc...
|
|
|
Post by crimebuff55 on Mar 17, 2009 17:24:36 GMT -5
I'm not trying to be mean here, crimebuff, but you didn't read my post well enough if you responded like you did to it. Read it again; you'll see we all know Baby Killer is a Ho, but on an ethics committee that means little. She could have seduced Baez, but the burden is on him to keep ethical. Tho he's such an ambulance chaser, he probably has a whole new spin on attorney/client "privilege". What I said the prosecution wants to make sure they have an airtight case, and not Casey winning on an appeal for a retrial because Baez did not represent her well because he was spending too much time in her pants. You know court trials, all types of things can come up, i.e. no miranda, police brutality, etc... We posted a lot of words..... but I merely pointed out that you stated "he seduced her"..... which was unlikely regardless of "ethics" within the trade or not. The entire "ethics" concept is BS. People are honest or they aren't. Realtors use the "ethics" scam to try and convince a very naive public that it means honesty. I always laugh at that because my brother as a Realtor briefly and he told me the "ethics training" that was required was a really laughable, one hour video which was essentially worthless and the proctor.... the Title Company.... told him that "most people just turn off the video & turn in the paperwork." So much for "ethics." I'm sure it amounts to the same stuff within the defense lawyer trade. Pure BS.
|
|
|
Post by kehgonthediva on Mar 17, 2009 18:44:51 GMT -5
<sigh>
This is like beating a dead horse.
I said SHE WOULD CLAIM Baez seduced her. And she's that nasty of a person, too. And regardless of your opinion on ethics, would mean little if she brought up accusations on Baez. He'd proably be disbarred. Because she is just the type of person to ruin the lives of everyone around her.
|
|
|
Post by jenarosa on Mar 19, 2009 22:52:16 GMT -5
Law enforcement in Orlando called upon this (woman) clinician to assess the Casey Anthony case; they wanted another opinion (please read this report it is extremely enlightening) all stuff we've already talked about here in Basement Dwellers for months. This doctor puts a really awesome "spin" on Ms. Anthony and her motivations/psychosis etc. This woman hits it dead-on. I really liked the part about Casey being a (dark damsel) and this type of personality basically lives to manipulate men, which we've seen Casey pretty much manipulate everyone in her entire life, just happens that now her whole world has collapsed, but doesn't mean she won't keep using the tatics and manipulations that have worked for her all her life. I find Casey Anthony to be the most Evil, manipulative of men, deceptive, insane, devious, murderous person. BUT, for a person like this to operate, they must have qualities that people around them find extremely appealing such as beauty, ingagine, fun etc. I'm sure we all know people in our own lives that have these same qualities and live on the edge. Please read, you'll love her spin. jenarosa blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/2008/07/id-exclusive-cr.html
|
|
|
Post by jenarosa on Mar 19, 2009 23:07:34 GMT -5
|
|