|
puzzled
Mar 27, 2009 8:41:56 GMT -5
Post by wolfette1961 on Mar 27, 2009 8:41:56 GMT -5
why are they asking such questions in this other case...they have asked alot of things that arent even close to this ohter thing...shouldnt the questions be have you heard casey say her name or talk to her on the phone or ever say where she has been..how does do you know who the father is relate to the other case ..did cindy have any goings on with the other pi not sure where that comes into the nanny questions shouldnt those questions they are asking relate to the nanny and if they know anything bout her ...asking stuff on the other case is wrong and probing if you ask me
|
|
|
puzzled
Mar 27, 2009 13:39:39 GMT -5
Post by janea64 on Mar 27, 2009 13:39:39 GMT -5
I'm not sure what all the questions are that you are referring to, but when Caylee first was discovered missing, the question of who fathered Caylee was because the father or someone in the father's family may have taken Caylee. The police were exploring every option to try and find Caylee since the nanny story was turning into a dead end.
When the investigation showed that no one knew who the father was and Casey had told so many people so many different things about the father and that Casey hid and lied about her pregnancy for so long, questions of incest were raised.
So now the question of who was Caylee's father is still relevant because if it is Lee or George, this would be a motive for murder, rather than a careless accident. But Baez could use that as reasonable doubt that the father kidnapped and killed the child to punish Casey for her partying and sleeping around and not being with him and not letting him be a part of Caylee's life.
Now if Caylee was fathered by George or Lee, LE already knows that from DNA tests. And the DA will keep that card to his chest until the trial so that they can re-enforce premeditation.
Yes, I think John Morgan is overstepping his boundaries a bit with some of the questions, but the more that comes out in his depositions, the more he can prove his case for the real Zenida.
|
|
|
puzzled
Mar 27, 2009 15:29:41 GMT -5
Post by wolfette1961 on Mar 27, 2009 15:29:41 GMT -5
they have already said lee is not the father to caylee and casey couldnt pick out zenida from a photo they had she said she didnt know that woman and had never met her...i know for fact there are tons of zenida's as a matter of fact my daughter worked with one in idaho lol i just think that alot of the questions they have asked are not important to the zenida case what so ever so it would seem to me they too are working for the da...lol just a thought
|
|
|
puzzled
Mar 28, 2009 21:06:21 GMT -5
Post by jenarosa on Mar 28, 2009 21:06:21 GMT -5
This is my thought on John Morgan...I think the Prosecution is behind "John Morgan" and this is where these questions like, "Do you know who killed Caylee? or Do you think that Casey is capable of killing Caylee? or Do you know who the father of Caylee is?" Why would a defamation case lawyer ask such questions? They do not pertain to the Zanieda lawsuit at all. I think that the State saw a way to "get to" Casey and (force her) to answer questions that she lied about, but she pled the 5th. However, they can still gleen information from the people surrounding the case LIKE Lee, George, Cindy, Kronk and others. I absolutely believe the prosecution is behind this, as they were behind the set up Casey viewing Caylee's remains and filming her/while LE was all there to witness her reaction. Of course, they want to recoup their witness' name, and get $15,000 for her, but these other questions are from LE. I would bet... jenarosa Their going to catch her in anyway that they can, and since she's never "broken" and given them one ounce of information, this is a way of getting to the truth. Sound illegal, but you know cops use these methods all the time.
|
|
|
puzzled
Mar 28, 2009 21:57:37 GMT -5
Post by janea64 on Mar 28, 2009 21:57:37 GMT -5
This is my thought on John Morgan...I think the Prosecution is behind "John Morgan" and this is where these questions like, "Do you know who killed Caylee? or Do you think that Casey is capable of killing Caylee? or Do you know who the father of Caylee is?" Why would a defamation case lawyer ask such questions? They do not pertain to the Zanieda lawsuit at all. I think that the State saw a way to "get to" Casey and (force her) to answer questions that she lied about, but she pled the 5th. However, they can still gleen information from the people surrounding the case LIKE Lee, George, Cindy, Kronk and others. I absolutely believe the prosecution is behind this, as they were behind the set up Casey viewing Caylee's remains and filming her/while LE was all there to witness her reaction. Of course, they want to recoup their witness' name, and get $15,000 for her, but these other questions are from LE. I would bet... jenarosa Their going to catch her in anyway that they can, and since she's never "broken" and given them one ounce of information, this is a way of getting to the truth. Sound illegal, but you know cops use these methods all the time. Sound like you are on Casey's side here jenarosa? The one who wanted to stick a needle in Casey's arm. Have you had a change of heart? No offense please. I would be willing to bet money that John Morgan has a grudge against Casey since she snubbed her nose at him, and he would love to cause her as much shame as Casey has cast upon his client. I have not heard or read anything (other than from Camp Crazy) that Caylee was not a product of incest, and I am not saying that she was). But if Morgan can find a motive, yes that helps the DA, but also helps his case. But if the LE already knows that Lee or George is the father and under oath, any of the Camp Crazy denies knowledge in Casey's murder case, they can be held in contempt and any of their rantings about what an angel Casey is will be stricken from the record, if they are even allowed to testify since they will be known to lie under oath! There is so much that goes on behind the scenes of trials that should be criminal and the public never knows about it. This case may just bring to light the back room deals! I have said for many years that the judicial system is seriously broken and it all boils down to who has the most cleaver scum bag... oops did I say that? I meant attorney! Yes there are honorable attorney's out there, but they are far and few between, and most do not do criminal cases. Just do some research on how much public money is issued to the public defender's office and how much is issued to the district attorney's office in any town USA.
|
|
|
puzzled
Mar 29, 2009 6:02:29 GMT -5
Post by wolfette1961 on Mar 29, 2009 6:02:29 GMT -5
ok they have said that lee is ruled out as a father they never said if they ruled george out but lee was not caylees father they did a big 15 minute thing on ng over that issue the last week or two they had no information on if george was or not i believe is what she said
|
|
jami
Basement Serf
Posts: 19
|
puzzled
Apr 14, 2009 15:58:28 GMT -5
Post by jami on Apr 14, 2009 15:58:28 GMT -5
Okay....where the hell did this John Morgan come from? Who is he? Does he know Casey? Are we sure he is not some sort of "plant" by the defense to show reasonable doubt? Here this guy is saying he has searched the area three times and also that PI Anthony dude and they did not find the remains. I am telling you that Baiz wants to be able to say that the remains were put there later. Janea64 said that John Morgan is pissed because Casey snubbed her nose him, don't bet on it. It looks to me that Casey fucks anything, obviously. This guy just missed out, that's all. Nevermind about calling Guiness.
|
|
|
puzzled
Apr 14, 2009 17:02:06 GMT -5
Post by janea64 on Apr 14, 2009 17:02:06 GMT -5
Okay....where the hell did this John Morgan come from? Who is he? Does he know Casey? Are we sure he is not some sort of "plant" by the defense to show reasonable doubt? Here this guy is saying he has searched the area three times and also that PI Anthony dude and they did not find the remains. I am telling you that Baiz wants to be able to say that the remains were put there later. Janea64 said that John Morgan is pissed because Casey snubbed her nose him, don't bet on it. It looks to me that Casey fucks anything, obviously. This guy just missed out, that's all. Nevermind about calling Guiness. When the laws changed allowing attorneys to advertise, John Morgan was the first to jump on the band wagon. His law firm has had several name changes over the tears, but hid "For the People" tag line has remained. He advertises quite frequently. He started out advertising he specialized in DUI (when the penalties became more severe), that is until he got his own DUI arrest. No he specializes in class action suits, worker rights, malpractice and injury. He was trying to trip them up and fluster them until they slipped and said something incriminating. He also proved that they are willing to commit perjury under oath. What are C&G going to do when they have to get on the stand with Judge Strickland and they do not have Brad sitting at their elbow. John Morgan is a jerk and very arrogant. Cindy and George started attacking him verbally when the suit was first announced. John Morgan threatened to sue them for liable and it has just snowballed from there.
|
|
jami
Basement Serf
Posts: 19
|
puzzled
Apr 15, 2009 10:52:58 GMT -5
Post by jami on Apr 15, 2009 10:52:58 GMT -5
"I see" said the blind woman. Thanks janea64. I had him confused with that guy that has just surfaced saying he grew up in the neighborhood where the Anthony house is and he took it upon himself to search the area three times but found nothing. Why is this guy sticking his nose where it does not belong? I think he is a plant for the defense.
|
|
jami
Basement Serf
Posts: 19
|
puzzled
Apr 15, 2009 10:54:25 GMT -5
Post by jami on Apr 15, 2009 10:54:25 GMT -5
Thank you for the heads up Jane!!!
|
|